Category Archives: Nigel Davies

Candidates Review

Unusually for me I’ve been taking a look at some of the games from the Candidates Tournament with the official web site being here. There’s certainly been plenty of fighting and original chess, the following game quickly leaving the beaten track early on (11.f4 looks like over the board inspiration). Shakhriyar Mamedyarov must have missed 14.Nde4 as that wins his queen for inadequate compensation:

In the following Youtube video Magnus Carlsen offers some nice insights and seemed to be enjoying watching the scrap to get to face him.

Nigel Davies


Chess Books That Don’t Need A Set

In an effort to get my son to combine reading practice with some chess, I recently started looking round for instructive chess books that don’t need a set. There are plenty of books with chess problems and no text and quite a few written about the game but without any meaningful chess content. Could I find some which combined the two aspects?

I did find some, but not that many. In fact only one that was really suitable. Bruce Pandolfini’s Weapons of Chess got the gold medal as it explained a lot of concepts and ideas just with diagrams and text. And a copy should be with me by the time you read this.

What about the others? Well new contributor Steve Giddins wrote quite a good one with his 101 Chess Endgame Tips, though you’d need to be a very strong player to get through some of the endgames ‘blindfold’. There are some old books that are suitable too, such as Fischer-Spassky Move by Move by Larry Evans and Ken Smith, which has a comment and a diagram after every move. But there really aren’t that many when you look at the total number of chess books that have been published.

This strikes me as being strange as it’s hard work to get a set out and follow the moves in a book like that. Most amateur players have little stomach for using their leisure time like this and would much prefer to skim through something and ignore the chess content. And this won’t do their chess much good.

What may eventually happen is that chess books will be replaced by software and e-books, but perhaps not quite yet. Whilst many e-books are very good, and take full advantage of the new media, there are others, such as some kindle offerings, which do not. Putting a conventional chess book into kindle format, without adding extra diagrams, will make things a lot harder for the reader rather than easier because books printed on paper are more robust and easier to handle. Of course they could have put a diagram after every move in kindle versions, but then that would have added to the production costs in an attempt to exploit an uncertain market.

So meanwhile I’m still in the market for printed books that don’t need a set. And if anyone knows of one then please leave a message under this post at the Facebook page for The Chess Improver.

Nigel Davies


Some Reasons Why Talent Fails

When talented kids go on to succeed it always seems like it was bound to happen, and most great players showed considerable early promise. Accordingly it seems natural to assume that adult success will inevitably follow early successes, yet this doesn’t seem to be the case.

Many top juniors actually give up the game or fail to follow through. All we see are the winners and not the original line up.

In fact I think that childhood ability may actually serve to sabotage adult success in a number of subtle ways. First of all it sets up very high expectations that will turn into frustration if progress slows down or stops. Early success is also unlikely to foster the kind of rigorous self analysis that tends to be needed as you get to higher levels. Bad habits are likely to persist rather than get eradicated.

How can prodigies stand a better chance of success? Here are a few suggestions:

  1. Avoid the press like the plague.
  2. Give them the opportunity to get crushed by someone stronger rather than score hollow victories.
  3. Foster an attitude of continual self-improvement.
  4. Avoid stroking their young egos.
  5. Try to get them help in developing a balanced and mature chess style.
  6. Prepare them for disappointment.

Here’s a Youtube video about how child stars can be horribly affected by a surreal early environment. And whilst early chess success is hardly going to have the same effect I think it serves to show some of the dangers:

Nigel Davies


Missing Wins Is Normal

There’s been a lot of talk about Hikaru Nakamura’s missed win against Magnus Carlsen at the recent Zurich tournament. It does look as if 37.Qf1 would have been strong and here’s a video of the game:

Of course it’s all too easy to find such moves in these days of high powered engines. It’s also tempting to blow this lost opportunity out of proportion, especially given Carlsen’s status in the chess World. Missing wins is actually rather normal, especially in such complex games.

What we can say is that generally speaking stronger players will miss fewer such opportunities, and Carlsen turned things around with icy efficiency once he was let off the hook. He’s also set up his own Youtube channel that you can find here; there’s not much up there at the moment but I guess it’s coming. Will there be some chess? One would certainly hope so!

Nigel Davies


The Businessman’s Opening

What should you play if you have very little time to study? One answer is to adopt the Colle System which acquired the name Businessman’s Opening as it requires very little time to learn and maintain. White plays 1.d4 followed by 2.Nf3 and 3.e3 almost regardless of how his opponent answers.

There are two different flavors of Businessman’s Opening, the Koltanowski treatment with c3, Nbd2 and Bd3 and the Zukertort treatment with Bd3, b3 and Bb2. Which is better? Well it depends what Black does. And against certain Black set-ups it might be better not to play the Colle System at all.

Here are a couple of Youtube videos which give an idea about how to play this opening. There are also other resources such as the DVD I did for Chessbase.

Nigel Davies


A Budapest Gambit Revival

An interesting tendency during the last couple of decades has been an increasing prevalence of very sharp and direct openings. Instead of King’s Indians we are getting a lot of Slavs, and openings such as the Ruy Lopez have been replaced by the Scotch.

I suspect this is largely connected to the rise of chess engines as a study tool. Most modern players will be making use of an engine when they analyze which in turn will nudge them towards position in which engines excel. This means direct openings in which sharp play is possible in the very early moves.

Among the latest openings to find favor with the 2700 club is the ancient Budapest Gambit with 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5, which recently claimed a noteworthy victim in the game Gelfand – Rapport. Here’s a nice video explaining what happened:

Could this have started a fashion? Well maybe, because the following game was played shortly thereafter. But White can get a small advantage with 3.dxe5 Ng4 4.e3, intending to put his king’s knight on h3. And if he’s really worried about the Budapest there’s always 2.Nf3!

Nigel Davies


The Problem With Commital Formations

At club level a very popular approach is to set up a particular formation regardless of what the opponent plays. A triangle of pawns on e3, d4 and c3 is one example, and White might also put a pawn on f4 to produce a Stonewall Attack. The fact that this can also be used as Black against 1.d4 and Flank Openings is often seen as a bonus because there’s less to learn. But there are also dark sides.

The main issue is that a variety of formations are needed to cultivate one’s positional understanding, without this players stagnate. There’s also a practical case for not being too predictable; if someone knows what set-up you’re going to adopt he can lay out his own forces so that they adapt.

Here’s a stonewall formation getting taken apart by the then youthful Vlastimil Hort with White never really getting much play. It’s not that White is lost out of the opening, and I’m sure that improvements can be found. It’s just that it’s a serious handicap, which you can well do without when facing powerful opposition.

Nigel Davies


The Changing Face of Junior Chess

Last weekend I was a coach at the National Junior Squad Coaching Weekend in Knowsley. One of the sessions was not for the kids but for parents instead, and an interesting topic came up. Chess is now very popular at primary school level (up to age 11) but on moving to secondary school most of the kids give the game up.

One of the main problems is clear, in the UK there seems to be no structure in place for them to continue their chess at secondary school. This is very different to the situation when I was at secondary school, back in the 1970s. Chess was very popular in secondary schools then, with matches taking place at both a local and national level. I also got the chance to play for a thriving club which had a quite child friendly venue.

What has changed? A number of things really. First of all the child safety regulations have become much tougher making it far more complex to organize a match than just booking a mini bus or arranging sandwiches for visiting teams. There’s also a lot more homework for the kids plus marking this and other obligations for teachers. None of this encourages anyone to volunteer for after school chess match duty.

As far as clubs are concerned they face a major issue that they seem to be dying out. Most chess club members seem to be over 50 and there’s not much sign of any young players coming in to keep them going. A few clubs have junior sections in which they try to incorporate young players, but this all needs time and effort. As a chess parent I can attest to the difficulties I’ve had in finding a suitable adult club for my son. Most of them seem to be held in drinking establishments and they go on too late. In many countries it’s often different of course with chess being played at weekends rather than in the evenings.

Internet chess is doubtless partly responsible for diminishing numbers at clubs. It’s not that people prefer playing on the internet, it’s just easier for them to get their chess fix in that way when balancing various aspects of their lives. To some extent young players who want to continue playing after 11 can use internet games as practice. But it’s not the ‘real thing’, and doesn’t really provide the social aspects that many players enjoy.

So how should a young player, who has played at primary school, continue his interest? Basically you have to do what you can with the resources that are available and a very important step, in my view, is that he or she should make the transition to adult tournaments as early as possible. How can you make this leap from junior chess? Essentially in the same way that anyone improves, do lots of tactics, read some good books (possibly with an adult explaining things along the way) and try to play some good quality games. And if you can find a good one then get a coach.

Nigel Davies


New Year Resolutions

First of all I’d like to wish Chess Improver readers a happy and successful New Year! Although I don’t think this time has any ‘real’ significance, it is a time at which many of us want to draw a line beneath the past and start again.

What are suitable New Year Resolutions for someone who wants to improve their chess? Essentially they need to be framed in terms of practice rather than results. A poorly constructed Resolution would be to ‘win every game’, as this is largely dependent on what the opponent does and is likely to fail early on. A very good one, on the other hand, would be to solve a certain number of chess tactics every day.

How many problems should that be? Well it’s best not to be too ambitious as it will be dispiriting to fall short and this in turn may lead to the abandonment of the project. It’s also good to build in some flexibility whereby you have a chance to catch up if you miss a day or two.

Are there any ready made platforms for this? Well Chessity is a good one that my son uses, a decent goal being to get and maintain an 80% plus training activity rating. For 100% you need to solve 20 positions per day for 20 days so this allows a certain latitude.

Isn’t it too late to make New Year Resolutions as we’ve now reached January 6th? Well the good news is that there are lots of different dates for the New Year, depending on cultural traditions. The Aztecs, for example, had March 10th as their New Year and many other cultures also had New Year in the spring. In some ways this makes more intuitive sense as everything is growing, there’s not much new about the middle of winter.

One might also ask if there are better ways to look at the New Year so that it’s not the only starting point for improvement projects. There was also a nice post by Garry Kasparov on Facebook in which two of the points he made are well worth quoting:

  • The end of the year is a convenient reminder to look back and to look ahead. But you should do this every single day to reach your goals.
  • Let that be a New Year’s Resolution, to not wait until New Year’s Eve to make resolutions! Make them regularly & monitor your results.

This makes a lot of sense to me, the New Year can be a reminder to live an intentional life rather than sleep walk through it. Renewal can take place at any time and in any place, but the first step has to be a willingness to change.

Do I have any New Year Resolutions? Not really, though I have a number of projects which I’m hoping to come to fruition this coming year. First of all I’ll be making a small time comeback in local tournaments as my son Sam is now more or less established in adult competition and we can go to tournaments together. I’m also close to launching my coaching and video site Tiger Chess which I hope will become a major venue for those who want to improve their chess.

Nigel Davies


The Windy Road To Better Chess

Last Sunday my son suddenly produced a tournament result that was some 400 points better than his rating. People were more than surprised, they were gobsmacked. So what had happened?

In Sam’s case I think it’s down to the stages in someone’s development and at 11 years of age your brain can start to change a lot. I’ve been seeing changes in him for a few months now, he had started doing much better at school and reason things out with his chess. It looks like he’s reached the formal operational stage in Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development.

There’s also our extensive training program, but then that’s another story.

Kids are known to be able to improve quickly but nobody really expects the same of adults. It’s true that most adults fail to improve, yet there are exceptions. The case of Jonathan Hawkins amazing rise in his late teens is the stuff of legends. And I’ve seen this in others too, for example Ivars Dahlberg made an amazing rise from the 2200s to the high 2480s in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

What’s the secret? I think it can be many things, but common factors will be a strong desire to improve (strong enough to cause someone to practice) plus some insights into how to do it. In Hawkins’ case he made an extensive study of the endgame whereas Dahlberg managed to conquer his nerves during games with a series of relaxation protocols.

How should someone gain such insights? Probably the most important part is self-honesty, a willingness to look in the mirror and see the warts alongside any good points. Not many people can do this, partly because they lack the knowledge to put their play into perspective and partly because they may not want to admit to certain weaknesses.

In the light of the above the sort of smooth progression that’s implied in age/rating charts loses it’s meaning. Players that improve will show a steady rise, but the stats don’t include those who fail to make progress or drop out altogether (which includes most of the kids that played at primary school). If they did we’d see a very different picture, a sea of great flatness with perhaps a slight rise from childhood followed by a falling away in the twilight years.

Extraordinary achievements in any field simply don’t come on their own and the norm is not of improvement but rather stagnation. What is required is extraordinary effort, and this can come at any time once the decision to do so is made.

Nigel Davies