This interesting article shows that I’m not the only tai chi fanatic around, though I don’t know how he expects to manage on just 90 minutes practice per day. I usually do a couple of hours and this barely seems enough. Three or four would be more like it but it can be difficult to create the time.
Three to four hours per day is the sort of time I spent studying, thinking about and playing chess. During my formative years I did this solely to improve my own game, now it’s mainly in my work with students or writing. If chess wasn’t my job I think I’d spend several hours a day just looking at games and positions. If I didn’t do this I’d miss it.
Most people don’t do this, which is the number one reason they don’t progress as much as they hope. A snatched 30 minutes amidst the chaos of ‘normal life’ is what most people manage, and it’s never enough to achieve the kind of fluency they aspire to.
So is the price of mastery too high? Jonathan Miller sees tai chi as having applications to business as a reward, but I see it in different terms. Each moment spent on trying to master a particular art (whether it be chess, martial arts, music) can be so deeply centering that it’s a reward in itself. I’d also say that each additional moment you put in has an ever greater value as mastery emerges from the cloud of confusion.
Here’s a clip that Miller would like, Chen Bing doing Chen style tai chi: