A couple of weeks back my son asked me if we could go through some normal games rather than those with sacrifices. I thought this was interesting, he’d realized that queen sacrifices and the like don’t often happen and was doubting their relevance.
Thinking about it I find that I agree with him. I’ve come across many players, especially young ones, who are forever looking for some wild sacrificial idea because of an early diet of ‘brilliancies’. So they sacrifice when they should be capturing, attack when they should be defending and keep the queens on when they should exchange into a favorable endgame. But aren’t ‘brilliancies’ vital for our all important tactical vision?
This is certainly the story line, but actually I’m unconvinced that they develop chess vision any faster than a well played game together with some astute questions. Vision plays a vital part in every moment of any game, even if the tactics stay below the surface.
Here’s a fairly normal game played by one of my favorite model players, Paul Keres. Nothing spectacular, but excellent play and clean finishing.